Cheaper Way to Produce Antimatter

The increase in global population requires a proportional increase in power generation.

Currently, most of this is achieved through fossil fuels which dump greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This then leads to global warming, manifesting as natural disasters such as typhoons, floods, and heat waves. In fact, July 22, 2024 was the hottest day on record.

The current trend is unsustainable if the human species is to survive. For now, governments have been pushing for power sources that emit less greenhouse gases such as solar, wind, nuclear, and hydro power. But these have been proven to be inefficient, unreliable, expensive, or produce other kinds of waste.

Two new mechanisms can replace fossil fuels as a reliable energy source:

1. Nuclear Fusion – this uses the aether (empty space)

2. Antimatter Reactors – this uses the aetherspace (atomic space)

While nuclear fusion is the future of large-scale power generation, such as those for cities, antimatter reactions are the future of small-scale power generation for large buildings to large vehicles, such as cargo ships and large airplanes.

Antimatter vs Fission

Currently, humans only use nuclear fission which is a relatively outdated energy source compared to antimatter and fusion. Antimatter packs more energy per space than fission.

• The biggest fission-fusion H-bomb, the Tsar Bomba, yielded 50 megatons of TNT using 8 tons of uranium (a finite resource)
• An antimatter bomb can create the same with just over 1 ton of antihydrogen.

In energy terms, 1 ton of antihydrogen is a much lighter and renewable battery than 8 tons of uranium.

We know that fusion and antimatter will work and can become mainstream because:

• The Gray aliens already use antimatter as Element 115 as mentioned by Bob Lazar, to power small UFOs
• The Sassani aliens already use fusion to power large UFOs

The Problem with Physics

The problem is that physicists don’t really know how antimatter is created. They just go with Einstein’s E=mc^2 and smash mass to get a zoo of particles, some of which are antimatter.

This leads to the current brute force approach:

1. Protons are gathered into an electromagnetic beam
2. The energy of the beam is increased through acceleration in cyclotrons from MeV to GeV
3. The beam is then smashed into a block which is thought to receive “gluons” from the proton beam
4. Those gluons then magically convert to quarks and antiquarks which then interact with the other quarks to produce subatomic particles, some of which are antimatter
5. The antimatter is stored in electromagnetic decelerators

This whole approach is so inefficient and is why it will take 600,000,000 years to make 1 gram of antimatter.

The Mirco-Aetherspace Particle Solution

Cartesian-Spinoza Physics fixes this by pointing out the true binding mechanism of quarks is not the gluon, but the surrounding micro-aetherspace (atomic space just outside the proton).

These particles surround the quarks, making them form a “triangle” which Physics calls gluon flux tubes. This triangle prevents internal movement and this is what makes solid bodies solid.

When protons are smashed, these particles cross over and break all triangles.

1. A micro-aetherspace particle breaks up into 4 free-aethers.

One binds with a quark (1 aether), causing it to upgrade into a Z boson (2 aethers). This leaves 3 free aethers available.

2. The Z boson binds with 1 free aether, causing to upgrade into an electron (3 aethers).

This leaves 2 free aethers. The “search” for that free aether is why the decay of the Z boson is not instantaneous.

3. The electron binds with 1 free aether to become a new aetherspace particle (4 aethers).

This leaves 1 free aether.

4. The remaining free aether becomes a positron (anti-electron) in order to conserve the aethers.

What Physics calls “particle decay” is really the successive upgrade of matter particles (3rd Element) into space particles (2nd Element).

This manifests as quarks turning into other subatomic particles which then quickly disappear into space i.e. the aetherspace turns into the aether.

It follows that antimatter, as manifestations of the free aether, is Nature’s mechanism to conserve both the aether and energy, just as particles convert from one Standard Model particle to another.

We call this the Law of Conservation of Substance which is from the Convertible Layer (“weak force” in Physics).

This free aether* is what Supersymmetry Theory was looking for in the large hadron collider but could never find since the aether cannot be detected by instruments.

In a nutshell, using Descartes’ terminologies, the energy from the aether (2nd Element) that is used to produce antimatter (anti 3nd Element) converts back into the aether when it comes in contact with matter (3nd Element).

A Non Brute Force Approach to Producing Antimatter

Currently, Physics creates antimatter by smashing protons into a metal block, then confining the antimatter via electromagnetism.

We can call this as the “proton-to-matter-via-electromagnetism” way.

This is very crude as matter or the 3rd element is very crude.

A more advanced and subtle way to produce it is through the “proton-to-neutron-via-aether” way.

1. Unstable elements are created in colliders with the aether through fusion
2. The unstable element is confined by the anti-aether or dark gravity for transport
3. To use, a proton is injected into the element, causing an explosion

This is explained by Bob Lazar:

This method differs signficantly from the current approach.

The Tech Tree

We assume that the unstable element needs to be levitating in vacuum storage as to not touch any matterial thing. This is why it requires levitation technology as a prerequisite.