The Oversoul chooses the concept that will be dealt with.
But your mental self that which you consider to be a product of your personality chooses the methodology by which you will examine the concept in physical life.
There are many. It is not that there is a limitation of concepts.
The oversoul self chooses the general concept such as the idea of exploring self-empowerment through abundance.
An individual’s personality and mentality methodology may be to go about exploring this idea in many ways.
Can be through the expression of polarities positive and negative. can be through many different avenues and interactions with different other individuals. It is up to the personality to determine the methodology by which the whole consciousness will explore the idea of the relationship to the concept of abundance. But it is the oversoul choice to explore that idea.
Now there’s any particular methodology.
if you have one methodology with that can you uh infer which concept that you’re exploring when you if you look up in my life and I say well this is my the methodology I’ve chosen in this particular month or so to to explore a concept from that methodology can I infer what the concept is by using your imagination yes your imagination is the tool and the translation device and the bridge and the link between your physical personality and the oversoul self, the dream conscious you.
I spoke to you last week about my living situation. As you suggested, I went to this particular house the next day.
I found out that the people who are buying the house, even if they buy it, right? Well, so just as we also suggested, did we not that this might be one of the possibilities?
Yes, but there isn’t there are no alternatives now. There was nothing. There are always there are many alternatives, I’m sure, but there were none. Oh, but not one I think I should have.
Expectation on your life path is what you are doing to yourself. If you realize there are always alternatives, allowing those alternatives to be the alternatives you want because they exist in your reality.
If they were not the ones you chose, they would not be able to be perceived by you. You mean that the I mean there are no interruptions in your life. There is nothing extraneous in your life. There is no slop in your life.
There is nothing that is in your life without a reason for being there. Is the purpose of all this to teach? It may be to teach you that you do not need patience if you are willing to enjoy your life and everything in it.
If you are busy enjoying yourself, you do not need patience which then creates impatience. Need of patience is what creates impatience.
We suggest you allow what alternatives you can perceive to be the alternatives you chose to explore.
Then by dropping your expectation, you may allow yourself to see how one of these alternatives that does not seem connected to where you think you want to go may get you there quicker than any expectation you created because you will be busy enjoying yourself.
Time flies when you are having fun. You will not notice the passage of time. Things will happen very quickly. You will accelerate and lo and behold, as you say, you will find yourself at the place you wanted to be all along without ever having paid attention to exactly how you got there. You are going to put yourself on automatic pilot by enjoying your life as you create it.
So, would you suggest that I just uh take whatever?
You do whatever you feel like doing with whatever alternatives you have created and attracted to yourself. Follow your intuition. Follow your excitement. Follow your curiosity.
Then it will not be a difficult decision. You will be acting on your instinct.
Oh, white or white? Maybe two. Oh my.
As soon as I finished one thing something else would excite me. It was just like rolling for like a week. it’s like every moment was thrilling was thrilling brushing my teeth whatever was exactly what I wanted to do at that moment.
now I feel a little disappointed because life doesn’t feel that way it’s like.
it’s simply because you have now increased your scope of things of ideas. But you are still putting expectation that things should be like what you experienced as joyful before.
If you recognize that everything in your life as an opportunity, it will always be joyful whether or not you are actually experiencing or creating what you deem to be physiological joy during the experience or not.
There are many types of joy. It does not mean that you are not having a good time if you are not giggling at the top of your lungs.
I like to jump up and down.
Then feel free to jump up and down anytime you wish.
last week it was about 20 minutes when I was really bored and like nothing excited me you know why did you not listen to the silence there is much information in silence I guess I didn’t I I don’t know because you were judging the idea that that type of silence was not worth anything you’re right could have been simply for the opportunity for you to rest could have been either all right somewhere
A woman said I am All-That-Is. What the hell does that mean? I don’t look at myself as All-That-Is because I feel more like a fragment.
A hologram is a three-dimensional picture, created by a laser by an interference pattern which is a series of overlapping wave fronts that create a particular buildup of image in a certain way that it is omnidirectional in nature.
Take your hologram and cut it in half. You will have two whole holograms, not half and half. This is because major portions of the hologram contain the information of the total hologram.
In this way, the universe is holographic.
The potential for every point in the universe to express every other point is equal.
The potential for any object to exist at every point exists equally at every point. Every point is reflected in every other point.
In ancient India, the analogy is Indra’s net made of reflective pearls.
Each pearl has 360° spherical three-dimensionality and is perfectly reflective. It will pick up an image of every other pearl in the net.
Thus, each pearl contains the sum of the total net.
Likewise you and every being within are All-That-Is.
Even though it is a fragment, it contains the potential of the whole.
And because the idea of potential is only an expression in a time frame and to All-That-Is time does not matter that much and everything is simultaneous.
Then to All-That-Is, and its point of view, potential is real.
You are All-That-Is equally as much as you are a fragment of All-That-Is.
Paradox maybe. But only from your perspective.
But I said I only had two, but I got another one.
I’ve been uh really attracted to read the New Testament these days.
I have a Jehovah’s Witness friend and we talk about it.
I keep having the feeling that there’s something there but it’s not like I have a hard time believing that somebody would come to earth and say that you have to like believe in me and I’ll save you from your sins and that being did not say that.
that’s what I wanted to know is if you knew because I had the feeling what I was reading wasn’t what he really said and I was wondering if you could give me like a brief idea.
In written literature representing what that specific being said or did not say all that which you possess in your society that comprises written literature is approximately no more than 20% of all that was said and much of what is written is not what was said but an interpretation of what was said based upon the understanding of the individuals who heard it.
Understand in this way the being you refer to simply knew that like himself all beings were of the same level and could express the idea of the Christ consciousness through themselves as he had done.
As you allow yourself to be like this vibration that I am expressing to you, so you shall be like unto the idea of having what you turn to be heaven on earth. You will be of the vibration of that idea you call harmony.
This is a very small favor. It Consists of 3 little letters, one tiny word in your language.
I have such and such as you say with my fears, not but and. Oh, okay. I get it. Thank you. So, and yes. Uh, I’d like to know, you know, like when your imagination goes wild sometimes, like I had fears and I’d see like all kinds of army coming into my house and, you know, killing me all kinds of ways. Yes. All kinds of ways.
Yes. Killing you with kindness perhaps. No, I never saw that. Oh my god.
There’s an expression you have upon your planet. All right. Proceed. Okay. And um you know you have those pictures in your imagination. You have imagination in my pictures.
Also when you have feelings about something. Yes. You have pictures to sometimes feel something sometimes. I regarding my fears you know that department of fears. Department of Very good. Um, how I’d like to know an exercise or something that could uh help me to see the difference between feeling something’s going to happen really or I’m just letting my imagination going over.
Do you remember the library analogy?
All of the ideas, all of the pictures that you contain in your imagination are like a library full of books. You may always go into that library. You may sit there as long as you wish. You may read every book, good and bad, as you say, positive and negative, joyful and fearful, that exists within that library.
You do not have to check them out until you choose to. You may simply know that everything you experience within your pictorial imagination is because you are willing on some level to experience that idea.
Just because you are picturing it in your imagination does not mean you are saying that that is something you want to enact in your physical reality.
The two are not necessarily connected. One does not necessarily I’ll say forego the other. Okay. You can simply know that you are in your library reading all these fascinating books, positive and negative.
When you leave your library, what will be your physical reality will be the books you choose consciously to check out with you.
if one does experience something in one’s imagination, would the conscious knowledge that um one has lived out whatever that was in one’s imagination. Would knowing that um alleviate the idea of needing to experience it physically? Yes, sometimes.
Multiple personalities
Asker: I was watching KCT the other night and they had a program on multiple personalities. One fellow there, I think they had it 53 different personalities. Most of the personalities do not know of the other personalities. What is actually occurring with this person?
Bashar: Much in the same way that many of your psychologists think is happening. They are suppressing portions of themselves and that is the creative way they can allow them to rise to the surface and be equally valid to every other portion. It is then, in this way, their opportunity, their methodology, to believe that they need outside help—as you say, the psychologist—to allow them to integrate all these portions of their personality into one functional being.
We all have portions of ourselves that some of us separate more than others. But some of us are aware of these different portions without having to feel that they are distinct separate beings. What they have not learned in this physical life is the method of communication between those separate portions. Not unlike the frequent inability of ourselves to communicate between our aware consciousness and subconsciousness and unconsciousness.
Multiple personality is inwardly directed autism. Why don’t you understand an autistic individual? It is incommunicative to your outside world but very communicative to its inside world. Multiple personality individual is not communicative to its inside world but very communicative to its outside world.
Multiple personality is almost directly opposite of autism.
See all the multitudinous ways you have in exploring separation of self. We learn a lot from you.
Asker: I would like to ask you about my new baby. Her name… she was my sister. She contracted something called toxoplasmosis during her pregnancy.
Bashar: Lots and lots and lots of touching. Lots of loving. Lots of touching. Lots of mental communication. Lots of reinforcement. Lots of mental imagery of the child being able to communicate in whatever way it needs to. In whatever way it needs to, not how they think it should.
Many of these opportunities are opportunities for your society to explore new ways of communication. This is a service being done by this child. Your acceptance and allowance of this service to be done will allow the parents to communicate fully with the child and the child fully with the parents and the society. This is the lesson being taught by the child. What you’re saying to me only in a sense. Let us say, potentially in the sense that if the message is not received, then understand what it is a reflection of—the individuals not willing to receive the message, their own limitation, not the child’s limitation.
Asker: I as an American Indian, I was a man and my wife and child were killed, destroyed our village, and my wife had been the person—my sister—and a couple days—the child from that life was this child. Do you have that?
Bashar: Only that the symbol being proffered now by the child—who understands in having waited until you were both physically born and into your later years before being born itself—will be that it comes into your world with a greater innocence, less limited understanding of exactly what the created problem was in that time: lack of communication between two different worlds. Lack of understanding. Understand the child. That is All-That-Is necessary. Understand. Stand under. Support the child. Support the idea that the child is expressing and all the messages will be crystal clear. Don’t fight. You fight the child. Thank the parents. For us.
Asker: Yes. Relating to what you were talking about before about letting yourself go and following your imagination—and this is also related to judging others. If we as parents would let our children do whatever they want—
Bashar: I really don’t understand. We’ve got to teach them. Now this does not mean judging. This means preference. The teaching of preference as opposed to judgment which is an invalidation of something. Preference is not in this way. Simply recognize that there is obviously, because of the physical limitations upon the mentality and the consciousness, the opportunity for the training in this way of the child to a certain degree. But also recognize that much of what you fear you must teach the child is because you have already—not saying you specifically, but in general parents—already have taught the child to fear certain things.
Asker: Yes. And thus in this way you will find that the child will be acting on some of those fears or reacting to some of those fears rather than simply being allowed by the parent initially from birth and before birth to recognize that the child knows already when it is born what it is doing in a sense. Right? But we still have to send them to school and we can’t let them play in the backyard—
Bashar: One moment. When they want to play. But understand again, you are only giving excuses—illusions based on illusions.
Asker: What illusions?
Bashar: The idea in the way you have created the idea of going to school and the safety of your children is based upon the fear that you teach them when they are born. That this is the way it must be done because we fear such and such and such and such—and you are creating a loop so that by the time they are doing such and such and such, you say, “Why?” You simply find the only answer to be, “Because this is the way it always has been.”
Asker: I know, but so—from your point of view—how do you see the world, this planet, to be in terms of education of children, for example?
Bashar: In this way, we can only again not tell you what to do but simply suggest by reference, by analogy, that within our society, first of all, we are in communication with the being before they are born. We know who and what they are and why they are being born into our society, and we know they know it also. In this way, their interaction with us is complete and total, and in this way they are not isolated to be taught. They are allowed into the fabric of society to be taught. And in this way each child recognizes each adult to be his or her parents. Each adult recognizes each child to be his or her own in terms of the idea of the spontaneous interactions which take place. There is not the need for the tool of fear. Now recognize that by the time your child is able to be up and about by itself, it has already been programmed by you to know that limitation and know the fears that you have because it has to depend upon you for physical survival.
Asker: It will accept anything you teach it vocally and non-vocally.
Bashar: Not really in its personality. Yes, it will completely.
Asker: What would new parents on this planet should they do to change, or what can they do?
Bashar: Allow themselves to know that they can trust that:
- the child being born knows what it is doing.
- their own connection to the child and the child’s connection to them is never broken.
They are always in communication, and that the child and the parents will always sense what the other is doing and why, and that the child will know instinctively and by receiving from the parents vocally and non-vocally its reassurance of its innate safety and assuredness in creativity that it will always only do that which will be positively manifesting for the child and not negatively manifesting for the child because it will not feel the fear from the parents that the child must react to.
Asker: Back to the question about multiple personalities. Is there frequently cases where they’re actually two beings stuck together to one body?
Bashar: Not stuck. No one is ever stuck. you are experiencing that idea right now. My consciousness and the consciousness of the physical channel form a third personality that you are interacting with.
Thus there are 2 identities that you are now communicating with that has become a third identity.
Recognize all is by agreement. All is by synchronization of vibrational energy, and each concept unto itself is a complete idea. It is not that what you are communicating with is half me and half Daryl. It is its own concept.
Asker: But we wouldn’t normally run into people who are aggregations of lots of personalities that were separate distinct beings.
Bashar: But you do all the time. All of you are aggregations of many different ideas. Yes. But not separate. Not derived from separate songs.
Asker: Some. Could you talk more about that? Why? What’s interesting? Why? What is so interesting about it? That there are several oversouls that can be in one individual.
Bashar: Understand in this way the idea you call oversoul simply will carry within its own revenue a series of reincarnational lives. An oversoul can split off and become another soul. And thus in a way, individuals in one reincarnational cycle can actually have more than one oversoul in a sense. Understand that all of these connections are very arbitrary. They are all products of labeling, all products of diversification, all products of perspective. Especially from the third density point of view, they are all meaningful as tools, valid as perspectives to allow you to explore certain ideas and aspects of yourself, but on another level are all quite meaningless as all is one consciousness.
Asker: Are you saying that one body would be the manifestation of two or more oversouls?
Bashar: It can be if the purposes of the oversouls coincide.
Asker: What frequency or what percentage of the time does this actually occur on this planet?
Bashar: There is no way to translate that to you.
Asker: Would you say it’s rare or common?
Bashar: There is no way to translate that to you. It is something which is beyond time.
Asker: Okay. In general though, what we consider an individual being manifesting in an individual body—I think Ken’s original question was two individuals of that nature inhabiting a single body or more. Is that correct, Ken?
Ken: Yeah. Or 50 might be the case.
Bashar: No, your case was all right. The case in my 40. Thank you. One more time. Allow me to say first of all, we understand the concept you are proffering. But realize that from our point of view, the idea that anything can inhabit a body is a non-sequitur. Recognize nothing can inhabit anything. Your soul does not really exist in your body. Your soul is your body. Your body is your soul from another point of view. Even when you see the idea of being out of body or seeing the soul leave upon death—physical death—this is an interpretation of the third density understanding of the separation of the self. Nothing exists in anything. Everything is everything.
Asker: In that respect, then your entire reality, all physicality, would be the same as what you’re saying.
Bashar: Yes. And therefore it can be said—and why your question cannot be specifically answered—that you are all each and every one of you one thing and all each and every one of you everything and every personality that could ever exist. You are both. You are at both ends of the spectrum. You are the spectrum. You are all personalities. You are all oversouls. You are all spirit levels and alternate dimensions of density. All anything you wish to be. It is only a matter of perspective. How you see yourself.
Asker: So you wouldn’t find two spiritual entities jointly controlling the body or one mostly controlling the other one contributing ideas in a general sense?
Bashar: As we understand your question, allow me to say generally no. That will be of the most service to you as an answer.
Asker: Was there a male before the female?
Bashar: Yes. Then the female.
Asker: In one view or one perspective upon reality, is that that beingness is the underpinning or the basis for All-That-Is? And that knowingness would be the first separation out of beingness. That physical energy is a product of knowingness.
Bashar: Yes, in a sense it will do.
Asker: How then is it possible to channel, as it were, negative energy—or redirect would be a better word—negative energy so that one would be able to heal? In other words, turn that negative direction into a positive channel so that you could heal either yourself or others by offering a positive vibration and allowing the individual who is expressing and offering the negative vibration to choose a positive vibration for themselves. In other words, offering to them through your knowingness, offering them the opportunity to allow positive energy and negative energy to be equal to each other so that they can choose from equal choices. Right?
Bashar: Okay. Or in the same way offering them the idea that they don’t have to be trapped and that there’s no decision to be made.
Asker: Yes, there is in a sense a decision to be made. But the decision is theirs.
Asker: I have another question along another day. The communications device of the several stacked— I would like to make mine out of copper and not use crystal.
Bashar: All right. Will that significantly change? It will change it to some degree. You may, as we have suggested, also substitute for the crystal at this time the substance you call teak wood.
It will allow there to be an appropriate insulator. While not expressing some of the ideas of the crystalline form, it will suffice to prevent a distortion in the field that would result if it were all copper.
Asker: Yes. Very good. The antenna then is to extend out of the top the full—
Bashar: Yes. Okay. Does that antenna extend into only the top pyramid or through all three levels to the bottom? From the top, from the base of the top out only in the top. And the thickness of that—that is a solid rod, not a hollow tube—they are all solid rods.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.